gem5: mention dynamically linked executables not supported outside of x86_64

This commit is contained in:
Ciro Santilli 六四事件 法轮功
2018-10-26 00:00:03 +00:00
parent 34a8fa6a39
commit 09f610c009

View File

@@ -7802,7 +7802,7 @@ But at 185c2730cc78d5adda683d76c0e3b35e7cb534f0 they fail with:
fatal: Unable to open dynamic executable's interpreter. fatal: Unable to open dynamic executable's interpreter.
.... ....
and `cd "$(./getvar --arch aarch64 target_dir)` did not help: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50542222/how-to-run-a-dynamically-linked-executable-syscall-emulation-mode-se-py-in-gem5 and `cd "$(./getvar --arch aarch64 target_dir)` did not help.
The current FAQ says it is not possible to use dynamic executables: http://gem5.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions but I don't trust it, and then these presentations mention it: The current FAQ says it is not possible to use dynamic executables: http://gem5.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions but I don't trust it, and then these presentations mention it:
@@ -7811,6 +7811,11 @@ The current FAQ says it is not possible to use dynamic executables: http://gem5.
but I could not find how to actually use it. but I could not find how to actually use it.
Then I was told that it is has never been tested outside of x86_64:
* https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50542222/how-to-run-a-dynamically-linked-executable-syscall-emulation-mode-se-py-in-gem5
* https://www.mail-archive.com/gem5-users@gem5.org/msg15585.html
==== User mode vs full system benchmark ==== User mode vs full system benchmark
Let's see if user mode runs considerably faster than full system or not. Let's see if user mode runs considerably faster than full system or not.