3rd-party/linux-kernel-module-cheat
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/cirosantilli/linux-kernel-module-cheat.git synced 2026-01-23 02:05:57 +01:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

gem5: mention dynamically linked executables not supported outside of x86_64

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Ciro Santilli 六四事件 法轮功
2018-10-26 00:00:03 +00:00
parent 34a8fa6a39
commit 09f610c009
1 changed files with 6 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
README.adoc
View File

@@ -7802,7 +7802,7 @@ But at 185c2730cc78d5adda683d76c0e3b35e7cb534f0 they fail with:
fatal: Unable to open dynamic executable's interpreter.
....
and `cd "$(./getvar --arch aarch64 target_dir)` did not help: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50542222/how-to-run-a-dynamically-linked-executable-syscall-emulation-mode-se-py-in-gem5
and `cd "$(./getvar --arch aarch64 target_dir)` did not help.
The current FAQ says it is not possible to use dynamic executables: http://gem5.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions but I don't trust it, and then these presentations mention it:
@@ -7811,6 +7811,11 @@ The current FAQ says it is not possible to use dynamic executables: http://gem5.
but I could not find how to actually use it.
Then I was told that it is has never been tested outside of x86_64:
* https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50542222/how-to-run-a-dynamically-linked-executable-syscall-emulation-mode-se-py-in-gem5
* https://www.mail-archive.com/gem5-users@gem5.org/msg15585.html
==== User mode vs full system benchmark
Let's see if user mode runs considerably faster than full system or not.