From 09f610c009efd9275caa95b22bccc557b4e38f5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ciro=20Santilli=20=E5=85=AD=E5=9B=9B=E4=BA=8B=E4=BB=B6=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=E6=B3=95=E8=BD=AE=E5=8A=9F?= Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:03 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] gem5: mention dynamically linked executables not supported outside of x86_64 --- README.adoc | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.adoc b/README.adoc index 7385246..4c45b7c 100644 --- a/README.adoc +++ b/README.adoc @@ -7802,7 +7802,7 @@ But at 185c2730cc78d5adda683d76c0e3b35e7cb534f0 they fail with: fatal: Unable to open dynamic executable's interpreter. .... -and `cd "$(./getvar --arch aarch64 target_dir)` did not help: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50542222/how-to-run-a-dynamically-linked-executable-syscall-emulation-mode-se-py-in-gem5 +and `cd "$(./getvar --arch aarch64 target_dir)` did not help. The current FAQ says it is not possible to use dynamic executables: http://gem5.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions but I don't trust it, and then these presentations mention it: @@ -7811,6 +7811,11 @@ The current FAQ says it is not possible to use dynamic executables: http://gem5. but I could not find how to actually use it. +Then I was told that it is has never been tested outside of x86_64: + +* https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50542222/how-to-run-a-dynamically-linked-executable-syscall-emulation-mode-se-py-in-gem5 +* https://www.mail-archive.com/gem5-users@gem5.org/msg15585.html + ==== User mode vs full system benchmark Let's see if user mode runs considerably faster than full system or not.