mirror of
https://github.com/cirosantilli/linux-kernel-module-cheat.git
synced 2026-01-22 17:55:57 +01:00
futex_ldxr_stxr.c: fully reproducible in dynamically linked simulation
This commit is contained in:
@@ -12,11 +12,15 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#include <lkmc/futex.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#define LDXR_OPS_SIZE 1024
|
||||
static int futex1 = 1;
|
||||
static int futex2 = 1;
|
||||
atomic_int ldxr_done = 0;
|
||||
atomic_int stdr_wake_done = 0;
|
||||
static uint64_t ldxr_var = 0;
|
||||
/* We do this to ensure that those two varibles are well separated.
|
||||
* If they are too close (same cache line?), then the str to ldxr_done
|
||||
* can make CPU1 lose the lock. */
|
||||
static uint64_t ldxr_ops[LDXR_OPS_SIZE];
|
||||
static uint64_t *ldxr_done = ldxr_ops;
|
||||
static uint64_t *ldxr_var = ldxr_ops + LDXR_OPS_SIZE - 1;
|
||||
|
||||
void __attribute__ ((noinline)) busy_loop(
|
||||
unsigned long long max,
|
||||
@@ -32,11 +36,11 @@ void __attribute__ ((noinline)) busy_loop(
|
||||
void* thread_main(void *arg) {
|
||||
(void)arg;
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__ (
|
||||
"ldxr x0, [%0]"
|
||||
:
|
||||
: "r" (&ldxr_var) : "x0", "memory"
|
||||
"ldxr x0, [%[ldxr_var]];mov %[ldxr_done], 1"
|
||||
: [ldxr_done] "=r" (*ldxr_done)
|
||||
: [ldxr_var] "r" (ldxr_var)
|
||||
: "x0", "memory"
|
||||
);
|
||||
ldxr_done = 1;
|
||||
lkmc_futex(&futex1, FUTEX_WAIT, futex1, NULL, NULL, 0);
|
||||
lkmc_futex(&futex2, FUTEX_WAIT, futex2, NULL, NULL, 0);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
@@ -45,19 +49,21 @@ void* thread_main(void *arg) {
|
||||
int main(void) {
|
||||
pthread_t thread;
|
||||
pthread_create(&thread, NULL, thread_main, NULL);
|
||||
while (!ldxr_done) {}
|
||||
while (!*ldxr_done) {}
|
||||
/* Wait for thread1 to sleep on futex1. */
|
||||
busy_loop(1000, 1);
|
||||
/* Wrongly wake up the thread with a SEV. */
|
||||
/* Try to wake up the thread with an LLSC event.
|
||||
* It should not wake up in a correct implementation,
|
||||
* but it used to happen in gem5 before it was fixed. */
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__ (
|
||||
"mov x0, 1;ldxr x0, [%0]; stxr w1, x0, [%0]"
|
||||
:
|
||||
: "r" (&ldxr_var) : "x0", "x1", "memory"
|
||||
: "r" (ldxr_var) : "x0", "x1", "memory"
|
||||
);
|
||||
/* Wait for thread1 to sleep on futex2. */
|
||||
busy_loop(1000, 1);
|
||||
/* Wrongly wake thread from futex1 again. */
|
||||
/* But it is now sleeping on futex2, so this is wrong. */
|
||||
/* Before it was fixed in gem5, this would wrongly wake a futex2
|
||||
* because the previous futex1 was woken up via LLSC. */
|
||||
lkmc_futex(&futex1, FUTEX_WAKE, 1, NULL, NULL, 0);
|
||||
assert(!pthread_join(thread, NULL));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user