x86 asm: move binary arithmetic instructions from x86-assembly-cheat

README.adoc

@@ -10208,13 +10208,13 @@ There are not yet enabled, but it should be easy to so, see: <<add-new-buildroot
 
 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6147242/heap-vs-binary-search-tree-bst/29548834#29548834
 
-Usage:
+First we build it with <<m5ops-instructions>> enabled, and then we extract the stats:
 
 ....
 ./build-userland \
   --arch aarch64 \
-  --ccflagg='-DLKMC_M5OPS_ENABLE=1' \
-  --force-build cpp/bst_vs_heap \
+  --ccflags='-DLKMC_M5OPS_ENABLE=1' \
+  --force-rebuild cpp/bst_vs_heap \
   --static \
 ;
 ./run \
@@ -10910,7 +10910,7 @@ To use that file, first rebuild `m5ops.out` with the m5ops instructions enabled
 ./build-userland \
   --arch aarch64 \
   --ccflags='-DLKMC_M5OPS_ENABLE=1' \
-  --force-build c/m5ops \
+  --force-rebuild c/m5ops \
   --static \
 ;
 ./build-buildroot --arch aarch64
@@ -10941,7 +10941,7 @@ In theory, the cleanest way to add m5ops to your benchmarks would be to do exact
 
 However, I think it is usually not worth the trouble of hacking up the build system of the benchmark to do this, and I recommend just hardcoding in a few raw instructions here and there, and managing it with version control + `sed`.
 
-Bibliography:x
+Bibliography:
 
 * https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56506154/how-to-analyze-only-interest-area-in-source-code-by-using-gem5/56506419#56506419
 * https://www.mail-archive.com/gem5-users@gem5.org/msg15418.html
@@ -12353,7 +12353,10 @@ Bibliography:
 
 * link:userland/arch/x86_64/add.S[ADD]
 * link:userland/arch/x86_64/dec.S[DEC]
+* link:userland/arch/x86_64/imul.S[IMUL]
 * link:userland/arch/x86_64/inc.S[INC]
+* link:userland/arch/x86_64/mul.S[MUL]
+* link:userland/arch/x86_64/neg.S[NEG]
 * link:userland/arch/x86_64/sub.S[SUB]
 
 === x86 SIMD